Satire
is used by the leftwing as proof of an enlightened society and as proof of the
power of ridicule to change minds and by the rightwing as proof that it is
willing to be the butt of jokes because it knows that ultimately it is
meaningless and clearly toothless.
Satire
only becomes dangerous when it engenders a violent reaction based on whatever
ideology deigns to respond to it with violence. This is because amongst the
enlightened satire is a reversed reactionary apologism.
This is halfway toward an anticulturist
statement but can never be one because human algorithms are inbuilt with a
tendency to see meaning in the meaningless.
This
appropriation of symbols is also a central tenet of the anticulturalist view
but in contrast to punk or situationism it has no context whatsoever aside from
its own. The pathetic cuckoos of postmodernism are themselves subject to their
own rules and thus meaning is irrelevant.
This of
course is unwitting satire created by a lack of anything on which to anchor a
viewpoint. This divorce of symbolism from sloganeering, and vice versa, is
where the anticulturalist can reside only upon declaration of the same.
Because
the anticulturalist has no need for oppositional or supportive politics, they
are also meaningless. There is no context outside that decided by the
individual anticulturalist for his own needs at that moment and with whatever
information is appropriate to the anticulturalist at that time.
Everywhere
else these data units and satirical units and political units are uncoupled
from each other.
No comments:
Post a Comment